<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A data model for life-science experiments; FuGE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-data-model-for-life-science-experiments-fuge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-data-model-for-life-science-experiments-fuge/</link>
	<description>informatic musings on all things organic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Modeling experiments and presenting the information &#171; peanutbutter</title>
		<link>http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-data-model-for-life-science-experiments-fuge/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Modeling experiments and presenting the information &#171; peanutbutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>[...] This seems to be a change of tact  The original post was about a data model for lab notebooks . There is no reason why data streams can not be structured. However in reading the rest of Cameron&#8217;s post there would appear to be a 4th point of separation of modeling experiments, following on from the 3 presented here.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This seems to be a change of tact  The original post was about a data model for lab notebooks . There is no reason why data streams can not be structured. However in reading the rest of Cameron&#8217;s post there would appear to be a 4th point of separation of modeling experiments, following on from the 3 presented here.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science in the open &#187; Semantics in the real world? Part II - Probabilistic reasoning on contingent and dynamic vocabularies</title>
		<link>http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-data-model-for-life-science-experiments-fuge/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Science in the open &#187; Semantics in the real world? Part II - Probabilistic reasoning on contingent and dynamic vocabularies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>[...] there was more to come. Those of you who followed the reaction [comments in original post, 1, 2, 3] will also be aware that there are much smarter and more knowledgeable people out there thinking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there was more to come. Those of you who followed the reaction [comments in original post, 1, 2, 3] will also be aware that there are much smarter and more knowledgeable people out there thinking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science in the open &#187; Data models for capturing and describing experiments - the discussion continues</title>
		<link>http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/a-data-model-for-life-science-experiments-fuge/#comment-1202</link>
		<dc:creator>Science in the open &#187; Data models for capturing and describing experiments - the discussion continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peanutbutter.wordpress.com/?p=64#comment-1202</guid>
		<description>[...] Gibson has continued the discussion that kicked off here and has continued here [1, 2, 3, 4]to a few other places [1, 2] along the way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gibson has continued the discussion that kicked off here and has continued here [1, 2, 3, 4]to a few other places [1, 2] along the way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
